
Active-Empathic Listening Scale
Do you consider yourself a good listener? Take this test to find out if you really are.
By Mark Travers, Ph.D.
May 17, 2024

By Mark Travers, Ph.D.
May 17, 2024
Mark Travers, Ph.D., is the lead psychologist at Awake Therapy, responsible for new client intake and placement. Mark received his B.A. in psychology, magna cum laude, from Cornell University and his M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Colorado Boulder. His academic research has been published in leading psychology journals and has been featured in The New York Times and The New Yorker, among other popular publications. He is a regular contributor for Forbes and Psychology Today, where he writes about psycho-educational topics such as happiness, relationships, personality, and life meaning. Click here to schedule an initial consultation with Mark or another member of the Awake Therapy team. Or, you can drop him a note here.
Oftentimes, individuals either underestimate or overestimate their capacity to listen to others. Being a good listener is an integral component of being an effective communicator, and effective communication ultimately defines the success or failure of a relationship.
A good listener demonstrates empathy, maintains eye contact, avoids interrupting, asks insightful questions and provides feedback. They show genuine interest, exhibit patience and strive to understand the speaker's perspective without judgment.
The Active-Empathic Listening Scale (AELS) is a tool used to measure an individual's ability to listen actively and empathetically during communication. It assesses how well a listener understands, processes and responds to a speaker's message in a way that shows empathy and engagement. The AELS helps in identifying strengths and areas for improvement in listening skills, which are crucial for effective interpersonal communication.
You can take this test here. Follow all of the steps to receive your results.
References: Bodie, G. D. (2011). The Active-Empathic Listening Scale (AELS): Conceptualization and evidence of validity with the interpersonal domain. Communication Quarterly, 59, 277-295.